Đề ôn thi Đề thi vào lớp 10 Trường THPT Chuyên KHXH môn Tiếng Anh - Mã đề KHXH-52

The ocean is full of fascinating creatures, but few have a dining method as strange as the sea star, commonly known as the starfish. While it looks simple on the outside, have you ever wondered how (35) __________ starfish eats its prey, like clams or oysters? Its process is a remarkable example of adaptation and is quite different from how most other animals consume their food. This unique strategy allows it to eat animals much larger than its small mouth.

First, the starfish must locate and catch its meal. It moves slowly across the ocean floor using hundreds of tiny tube feet on its underside. When it finds a suitable clam, it uses its strong (36) __________ to wrap around the shell. The starfish then applies steady pressure, using its tube feet for grip, to slowly pull the two parts of the shell apart. It only needs a very small gap, just a fraction of a millimeter wide, to begin its incredible feeding process.

This is where things get truly unusual. The starfish cannot fit the clam into its mouth. So, (37) __________ eat the soft body of the clam, the starfish does something amazing: it pushes its own stomach out of its body through its mouth. This organ, which looks like a soft, thin bag, slides out and is placed directly onto the prey's soft tissues inside the shell.

Once the stomach is in position, it (38) __________ powerful digestive juices. These chemicals begin to break down the clam's body outside of the starfish. If a starfish didn't have this ability, it (39) __________ unable to eat its favorite food. A famous marine biologist once commented that this process (40) __________ one of the most efficient in nature. This method allows the starfish to (41) __________ of a large meal without much effort.

After (42) __________ all the liquid nutrients from the digested clam, the starfish's stomach slides back inside its body. The empty shell is left behind, and the well-fed starfish moves on, ready for its next meal. This incredible process of external digestion is what makes the starfish a successful and unique predator in the marine world.

Imagine this: a new blockbuster is out, and you’re deciding whether to see it. You open a movie app and see two very different numbers. One is the 'Tomatometer' score from professional critics, and the other is the 'Audience Score' from regular moviegoers. Often, these scores tell conflicting stories. This modern dilemma—whether to trust the experts or the crowd—is something every movie fan faces, especially on popular platforms like Rotten Tomatoes and IMDb.

Professional film critics are experts who have dedicated their lives to studying cinema. They possess deep knowledge of film history, narrative structure, and the technical aspects of filmmaking, like cinematography and sound design. Their job is to provide a detailed and objective analysis. They evaluate a film based on its artistic merit, the complexity of its themes, and its contribution to the art form. When a critic gives a film a high score, they are often appreciating its sophisticated storytelling or innovative directing, even if the film might not be simple entertainment.

On the other side of the screen are audience scores. These represent the collective voice of the public. Unlike critics, most audience members are not analyzing a film's technical details. Instead, their ratings are usually based on a more direct question: 'Was it enjoyable?' Audience scores, therefore, often reflect a film’s entertainment value and emotional impact. In places like Vietnam, the 'word-of-mouth' effect on social media and high ratings on booking apps can turn a film into a massive hit, regardless of what critics think. These scores are democratic; they show what the majority of viewers found fun and engaging.

So, why is there often a significant gap between what critics and audiences think? The primary cause is the difference in evaluation criteria. A critic might praise a slow-paced, thought-provoking drama for its powerful message, but audiences might find it boring and give it a low score. Conversely, a simple action movie full of exciting explosions might be a huge hit with audiences, while critics may dismiss it as unoriginal and lacking substance. Neither side is necessarily 'wrong'; they are simply judging the film from completely different perspectives.

Ultimately, deciding who to trust depends on what you are looking for in a movie. If you want to understand a film's artistic value and appreciate the craft behind it, critics' reviews are an invaluable resource. If you just want to know if a movie is a fun way to spend a couple of hours, audience scores might be a more reliable guide. Perhaps the best approach is a balanced one: use both. Reading a critic's review can prepare you for the 'what' and 'why' of a film's quality, while checking the audience score can tell you if it aligns with popular taste. This way, you can make a truly informed decision.